BYD Nepal Denies Explosion Claims Following Atto 2 Accident in Simara
Local police authorities have also backed the distributor’s statement, confirming the event was a standard road traffic accident rather than a battery-related hazard. Because online speculation intensified rapidly, both officials and the brand acted quickly to reassure the public regarding electric vehicle structural integrity.
Table of Contents
- The Reality of the Simara Accident
- Cimex Inc. Addresses the Misinformation
- Police Verification on Fire Rumors
- Next Steps: Technical Forensic Assessment
The Reality of the Simara Accident
The incident occurred on a Saturday evening at approximately 5:50 PM on the highway near Simara. The BYD Atto 2 involved in the event was operating as a test vehicle at the time of the crash.
- The Cause: The driver reportedly swerved suddenly to avoid a pedestrian who was crossing the road unexpectedly.
- The Impact: Due to the swift maneuver, the compact electric SUV collided heavily with a steel roadside railing.
- The Damage: While the front section of the vehicle sustained extensive structural damage, the passenger cabin remained entirely intact. Consequently, the driver walked away safely with only minor, non-life-threatening injuries.
Cimex Inc. Addresses the Misinformation
Shortly after videos of the damaged car began circulating online, Cimex Inc. CEO Sahil Shrestha published an official clarification. He explicitly requested the public to refrain from sharing unverified digital content that misrepresents vehicle safety.
“The vehicle involved did not explode,” Shrestha stated. “The incident was the absolute result of a highway road accident where the vehicle hit a roadside barrier. We are relieved to confirm that our driver is completely safe.”
Additionally, the management reiterated that consumer protection and safety remain the brand’s primary benchmarks, urging enthusiasts to rely solely on verified channels for updates.
Police Verification on Fire Rumors
Local police officials investigating the crash site also dismissed claims of a major fire or battery pack explosion. They clarified that the dramatic descriptions being shared by online observers did not match the physical evidence collected at the scene.
According to authorities, high-velocity impacts against steel barriers can naturally produce minor frictional sparks or localized smoke from crushed radiator fluids. However, the underlying high-voltage Blade Battery system did not ignite, rupture, or fail during the crash sequence.
Next Steps: Technical Forensic Assessment
Following preliminary clearing by highway police, the vehicle was securely towed to the authorized BYD Service Center located in Birgunj.
| Phase | Action Item | Expected Objective |
| Phase 1 | Secure Transport | Move chassis safely to Birgunj diagnostic bay |
| Phase 2 | Data Extraction | Download log files from the vehicle’s onboard computer |
| Phase 3 | Structural Check | Inspect Cell-to-Body (CTB) integrity beneath the floor |
Technical teams will now run full diagnostics on the electrical architecture to analyze how the impact forces were absorbed. This complete assessment will help provide definitive data to help permanently close the loop on recent social media rumors.
To follow the final technical report on this incident or to read independent reviews of the Atto 2’s safety performance on Nepali roads, check out Bijulidai. Alternatively, discover certified safety gear and premium dashcams at Oliz Store.